🔬 Learning research, plainly by Ask Poppy

Spaced repetition

Spacing beats cramming: the classic review of 317 experiments

In short: Across 839 assessments in 317 experiments, spreading study over separate sessions beat doing it all at once, and in only 12 of 271 direct comparisons did spacing show no benefit or a cost. The best gap between sessions grows with how long you need to remember the material.

PaperDistributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis
AuthorsNicholas J. Cepeda, Harold Pashler, Edward Vul, John T. Wixted, Doug Rohrer
Published2006 · Psychological Bulletin 132(3), 354–380
Study typeReview and meta-analysis (landmark classic) · Peer-reviewed
What we readFull text read. We read the authors' manuscript version on eScholarship.
Summarized

What they did

The authors pooled 839 assessments of distributed practice from 317 experiments in 184 articles on verbal memory tasks (such as word lists and paired associates). They analysed both spacing (one sitting versus separate sessions) and lag (how far apart the sessions are) against the retention interval, the time until the final test.

Who took part

Participants in 317 experiments, mostly lab studies of verbal recall.

What they found

Effect size: Reported as differences in percent recalled for each combination of gap and retention interval; there is no single headline effect size.

Limitations

What this means for learners and parents

Put it into practice (free tools)

Citation

Nicholas J. Cepeda, Harold Pashler, Edward Vul, John T. Wixted, Doug Rohrer (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin 132(3), 354–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354